June 1, 2026
Allegations
E.C. was charged with impaired driving following a motor vehicle collision in the early morning hours. Police arrived at the scene of an existing traffic accident, when E.C.’s vehicle struck a police cruiser. He was arrested for the offence of impaired driving and, shortly thereafter, a breath demand was made. A second officer on scene opened the door of E.C.’s vehicle and seized a beverage can from the rear seat, which the arresting officer relied upon, along with other observations (the odour of alcohol, E.C.’s confusion in producing his driver’s licence, and the collision itself) as grounds for the arrest. A subsequent breath examination yielded readings that were over the legal limit, resulting in a further charge of “Over 80”.
Defence Strategy
Mr. Fedorowicz filed a Charter application seeking exclusion of all evidence from E.C’s trial on the basis of multiple constitutional violations.
Result: Not Guilty
The Court granted the Charter application and excluded all evidence. In doing so, the Court found that multiple serious constitutional violations had occurred across two officers, and that admitting the evidence would bring the administration of justice into disrepute. As result, E.C. was acquitted of all charges.